|
The problem lies in the lack of control sites receive with Web-wide results. Take for instance, sports coverage giant SportsIllustrated.com (SI.com). SI.com uses a Google “enhanced” search bar. We typed “College Football” in the search bar expecting to get a list of SI articles and content. Instead, we were presented with five paid placements (from Google) and a list of unpaid search results. At the time of this writing, the top unpaid search result was a link to ESPN.com; SI.com’s competition! This is an objectionable result for SI.com. We repeated the search and restricted the results to SI.com. We got this response: No Article matches
for “College Football” on SI.com The Google “enhanced” search generated links to SI’s competitors, and the search technology SI.com uses for its site is unsophisticated and inadequate. Another example of search ranking difficulties can be seen at Washingtonpost.com, where a Web search for “Washington newspaper” supplies near 1 ½ pages of results before Washingtonpost.com is even listed. A searcher at Washingtonpost.com wouldn’t likely look for Washingtonpost.com while at the site, but their brand still suffers from unfortunate search ranking. Before you install
generic Web search technology, you’ll want to consider whether
you can control the results. Next month we’ll explore the deficiencies
of contextual ads and will follow up with how to avoid the common pitfalls
created by them. You can profit from outside search results and protect
your brand. Stay tuned! |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| contact | site map | legal | © Vortaloptics Inc. All rights reserved | |
|||||||||||||||